这句话本身是可以作为你论文或讲义里的“论点句/主题命题”的,
一种较精炼、便于展开三小节的写法可以是:
> 史百克的基督论——
然后直接接一个过渡句:
> 下文将以“基督的普世性 vs. 中国的本土性”、“基督的中心性 vs. 运动/制度的中心性”、“基督的权柄 vs. 人间属灵权柄结构”三方面,展开这一先知性关联的具体内涵。[
Sources
[1] The Horizon of Divine Purpose – Part 1 by T. Austin-Sparks https://www.sermonindex.net/
[2] Devotionals on Union with Christ https://devotion.knowing-
[3] Watchman Nee and the House Church Movement in China https://www.dwellcc.org/
[4] Watchman Nee – Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Christianity Home https://www.bdcconline.net/en/
[5] watchman nee (1903 -1972) a biographical study https://reformedperspectives.
[6] Austin-Sparks – Net (The Horizon of Christ-2) | PDF | Jesus – Scribd https://www.scribd.com/
[7] CHRIST- All And In All by T. Austin-Sparks – Identity Network http://www.identitynetwork.
[8] Christ – Facebook https://www.facebook.com/
[9] Christ as all and in all concept – Facebook https://www.facebook.com/
[10] T. Austin-Sparks Sermons, Articles & Books, Page 3 http://articles.ochristian.
[11] Collections – Austin-Sparks, Theodore – Library – BibleSupport.com http://www.biblesupport.com/
[12] Watchman Nee – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
[13] Book Corner – Plymouth Brethren Writings https://plymouthbrethren.org/
[14] Watchman Nee Meets T. Austin-Sparks – Frank Viola https://www.frankviola.org/
[15] Watchman Nee meets T. Austin-Sparks in England – Facebook https://www.facebook.com/
[16] View of THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF WATCHMAN NEE http://ojs.globalmissiology.